About Me

My photo
Lawyer Practising at Supreme Court of India. Court Experience: Criminal, Civil & PIL (related to Property, Tax, Custom & Duties, MVAC, insurance, I.P.R., Copyrights & Trademarks, Partnerships, Labour Disputes, etc.) Socio-Legal: Child Rights, Mid Day Meal Programme, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan, Women Rights, Against Female Foeticide, P.R.Is, Bonded Labour, Child labour, Child marriage, Domestic violence, Legal Literacy, HIV/AIDS, etc. Worked for Legal Aid/Advise/Awareness/Training/Empowerment/Interventions/Training & Sensitisation.

Contact Me

+91 9971049936, +91 9312079439
Email: adv.kamal.kr.pandey@gmail.com

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Govt. complaint against HC Judge triggered a row

HYDERABAD : The state government’s complaint against Justice A. Gopal Reddy of the AP High Court to the President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has triggered a major row.
The judge’s reported remark about land encroachment by the state government had prompted the latter to write to the CJI and the President. The Bar Council of the Andhra Pradesh, the High Court Advocates Association and the AP High Court BC Advocates Association on Friday strongly condemned the government’s action as an infringement on the judicial terrain. They urged the Chief Minister, Dr Y.S. Rajasekhar Reddy, to intervene in the issue and settle it before “Hyderabad becomes another Lahore.” “It is for the first time in the history of the AP High Court that the State government has complained against a judge,” said Mr S. Satyam Reddy, President of the High Court Advocates Association. “This indicates that the government will not spare anyone who criticises it.” The Bar Council felt that such a letter from the state government would affect the functioning and independence of the judiciary. “Since the government is the respondent in the matter, it is not befitting of it to address such a letter to the CJI and the president,” said Bar Council chairman A. Narasimha Reddy. The Bar Council held an extraordinary emergency meeting and decided to form a committee comprising Ghanta Rama Rao, C. Pratap Reddy and B. Devanand to look into the matter. The BC Advocates Association too constituted a four-member team to decide the further course of action. Prominent advocates feel that the government should file a “recuse petition” and settle the matter in the state itself. Under the recuse petition, the judge against whom the complaint is lodged will give his version, and may or may not accept the charges levelled against him. This will settle the issue. A majority of the advocates felt that the government should first have brought the issue to the attention of AP High Court Chief Justice A.R. Dave before sho-oting off a complaint letter Meanwhile, Justice Gopal Reddy met the Chief Justice at his chambers for 15 minutes and reportedly presented his views. Later in the evening, the Chief Justice also had a chat with the AG. However, the AG told this correspondent that the Chief Justice did not mention the issue. Several other judges also met the Chief Justice in the course of the day.

www.andhracafe.com; Updated: 04-12-2008

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment