About Me

My photo
Lawyer Practising at Supreme Court of India. Court Experience: Criminal, Civil & PIL (related to Property, Tax, Custom & Duties, MVAC, insurance, I.P.R., Copyrights & Trademarks, Partnerships, Labour Disputes, etc.) Socio-Legal: Child Rights, Mid Day Meal Programme, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan, Women Rights, Against Female Foeticide, P.R.Is, Bonded Labour, Child labour, Child marriage, Domestic violence, Legal Literacy, HIV/AIDS, etc. Worked for Legal Aid/Advise/Awareness/Training/Empowerment/Interventions/Training & Sensitisation.

Contact Me

+91 9971049936, +91 9312079439
Email: adv.kamal.kr.pandey@gmail.com

Monday, March 10, 2008

Bombay HC quashes stay on Raj's gag order

Bombay High Court on Friday set aside the stay on gag order against Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray who had unleashed a tirade against North Indians.
A sessions court, which admitted Raj's plea challenging the extension of order by police on Thursday, had stayed it. The High Court quashed the stay taking into consideration the fact that the order, as it is, will expire on Monday. Raj's lawyers said they will apply to the sessions court to take up his application on Saturday.
Earlier, defending extension of the order (passed on February 11 originally), Advocate General Ravi Kadam said Raj's anti-north Indian campaign had led to migrants from UP and Bihar fleeing en masse from some cities.
Kadam cited Raj's open letter to Home Minister RR Patil published in a local daily as well as a press release he had issued condemning Bihar's legislators for targeting Governor RS Gavai, who hails from Maharashtra, to justify police's fear that he will cause further trouble if the order was lifted.
After February 11, 47 cases of rioting had been registered against MNS workers, Kadam said. "He was determined to contiune (his activities)."
Police were, however, ready to give him a hearing, he said. However, Raj's lawyer Shirish Gupte noted that it was mandatory for police to give a person a show-cause notice before the prohibitory order was passed. No hearing was given to Raj prior to extension order of February 25, he said.
Further, Gupte argued, "When the order is to be extended, the state has to issue notification. No such notification exists."
Press Trust Of India
Mumbai, February 29, 2008

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comment