HYDERABAD: A division Bench of the High Court on Wednesday said that it was not inclined to pass orders pertaining to the ‘encounter’.
The Bench comprising Chief Justice A.R. Dave and Justice R. Subhash Reddy, made these observations while dealing with a writ petition filed by Varavara Rao, revolutionary writer on behalf of the Maoists, when they held talks with the government four years ago.
When the government pleader for Home Department informed the court that the encounter took place in Chhattisgarh, the case was closed as the court felt it did not fall under its jurisdiction.
Legal Correspondent, THE HINDU; Thursday, Mar 20, 2008
About Me
- Kamal Kumar Pandey (Adv. Supreme Court of India)
- Lawyer Practising at Supreme Court of India. Court Experience: Criminal, Civil & PIL (related to Property, Tax, Custom & Duties, MVAC, insurance, I.P.R., Copyrights & Trademarks, Partnerships, Labour Disputes, etc.) Socio-Legal: Child Rights, Mid Day Meal Programme, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan, Women Rights, Against Female Foeticide, P.R.Is, Bonded Labour, Child labour, Child marriage, Domestic violence, Legal Literacy, HIV/AIDS, etc. Worked for Legal Aid/Advise/Awareness/Training/Empowerment/Interventions/Training & Sensitisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment